It’s Veterans Day, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Is under fire following her remarks at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) in which she agreed with a comment that the US military is a “biggest polluter over 140 countries combined.”

Pelosi, responding to a question asking whether the US military is exempt from climate talks despite being a bigger polluter than 140 countries combined, said: “We recognize that too,” before committing to move the Pentagon away from fossil fuels.

“As I said, the Defense Department sees this systemically, that we have to stop it as a national security issue. And one way to do that is to end our dependence on fossil fuels, which worsen the climate crisis, ”said Pelosi, who was visiting the conference with a group of lawmakers that included Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, DN.Y.

HOUSE DEMS DEFEND PLAN TO GIVE WORK PERMITS TO MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, AFFIRMING IT IS ‘NO AMNESTY’

Now critics are expressing concern that the real national security problem lies in a rushed transition from fossil fuels to new green initiatives.

“Sacrificing our prosperity and security to appease the ideological demands of climate activists is reckless,” Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., Told FOX Business, when asked about Pelosi’s comments.

“The safety and well-being of Americans must come first,” added the Arkansas senator, who served more than four years in the US military, with deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, before being honorably demobilized.

Despite warnings from critics, the Biden administration insisted on installing elements of the Progressive Green New Deal in military operations.

Assistant Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, speaking at Wayne State University in Michigan on Monday, touted the future of electric vehicles for military use, saying the Department of Defense (DOD) “can buy electric vehicles as easily as we can buy non-electric vehicles. , you know, non-electric vehicles. “

CONSUMER PRICES INCREASE AT THE HIGHEST IN 31 YEARS

The Heritage Foundation, however, warns that such a mission could quickly turn into an expensive endeavor: It estimates the cost of President Biden’s vow to replace the U.S. government’s 650,000 vehicles with electric models at around $ 20 billion.

Despite this, the Pentagon under Biden has maintained that climate change is one of – if not the greatest – threat to US national security.

Defense Press Secretary John Kirby endorsed Pelosi’s comments on Wednesday, saying: “We’re the biggest emitter here in the federal government. We know that, and that’s one of the reasons why we take the climate crisis so seriously. ”

Kirby also told Fox’s on Wednesday that “the two are equally important,” when asked whether China or climate change poses a greater threat to the United States.

When told about Kirby’s comment, Cotton was stunned.

“Ask any American this question, and they will know the answer. This is why the Biden administration is losing to China,” he said.

THE CHOICE OF THE MARXIST TREASURE OF BIDEN WANTS TO KILL JOBS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE

Other lawmakers have pointed out that while the end goal is admirable, compromising national security is not a goal.

“Trying to make vehicles more fuel efficient is a good goal, but it cannot come at the expense of military readiness,” said Rep. Brian Mast, R-Fla., Who served more than four years in the American army.

“China produces double the greenhouse gas emissions of the United States and is developing hypersonic missiles to boot. The Biden administration must focus on winning real wars instead of ‘awakened’ culture wars,” he said. sued the congressman from Florida, who was stationed in Afghanistan. before being honorably removed from office.

Another outspoken expert on the subject is the retired Air Force Brigadier. General Robert Spalding, who served as senior director of strategic planning at President Trump’s National Security Council (NSC).

“I think it’s wrong to think of the Defense Department as the way you fight climate change. Maybe the EPA, maybe American scientists, but not the Defense Department – which has to focus on our opponents, ”Spalding said.

MANCHIN POINTS INFLATION CRISIS AS BIDEN’S EXPENDITURE PLAN MAY AT CONGRESS

Spalding, like Cotton, expressed doubts about the Pentagon’s initiatives, saying they could leave the United States exposed.

“We should be focusing on making our troops as deadly and as capable as possible, and one of those things has to do with logistics. So if we’re basically trying to find alternative energy sources that don’t are not as efficient as the ones we have today [and] increases our logistics footprint or makes deployment more difficult, then it wouldn’t be in the best interests of the United States, ”noted Spalding, who was also a military member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Spalding also lamented that politics again play a role in national security matters, lamenting that those goals may not be in the best interest of the United States.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT FOX BUSINESS

“National security should be immune to politics. It should focus on what is in the best interest of the country and what we need to do to keep this country safe. Charging an electric vehicle takes a lot of time. time. So I would hate to see how long it takes to charge an electric tank, “he concluded.